Skip to main content

Annual proprietary report

International Regenerative Medicine Patient Trends 2027

An annual read on who travels for regenerative medicine, what they ask before booking, and what actually decides their choice — with the survey instrument published alongside the findings.

Edition:
2027 edition, methodology published 2026
Published:
Update cycle:
Annual
Licence:
CC BY 4.0 with attribution

Who travels internationally for regenerative medicine, and what decides where they go?

This annual report tracks countries of origin, treatment categories, length of stay, the questions patients ask before booking, referral patterns and the factors that decide clinic selection. The 2027 edition reports enquiry and consultation data collected across the preceding year; the survey instrument and category definitions are published here in advance so results can be checked.

Key facts

Population
International enquiries and treated patients
Collection
Structured enquiry log plus post-consultation survey
Reported dimensions
Origin, category, stay length, questions, referral source, decision factors
First full edition
2027
Instrument
Published with the report
Status today
Methodology published; 2027 figures pending collection

What we know

  • Enquiry and consultation data can be categorised consistently when the categories are fixed in advance.
  • Decision factors are recorded from what patients state at consultation, not inferred from marketing performance.

What remains uncertain

  • The sample reflects people who contacted one Istanbul centre and is not representative of the global market.
  • Self-reported decision factors are subject to recall and courtesy bias.

What the report measures

Reporting dimensions and definitions
DimensionDefinitionSource
Country of originCountry of residence at enquiryEnquiry log
Treatment categoryGrouped clinical categoryMedical review record
Length of stayNights in Istanbul for treatmentCoordination record
Pre-treatment questionsCoded free-text questions asked before bookingEnquiry and consultation notes
Referral patternClinician referral, prior patient, search, otherPost-consultation survey
Selection factorsRanked reasons for choosing a providerPost-consultation survey

The survey instrument

  • How did you first hear about this centre?
  • Which other providers did you seriously consider, and in which countries?
  • What three questions mattered most before you decided?
  • Which factor decided it: evidence, price, laboratory documentation, physician, language support, timing?
  • Did a clinician at home advise for or against travelling?
  • How many nights did you stay, and was that what you planned?

Publication and correction policy

Category counts publish with the denominator and the collection window. Where a category is too small to report without risking identification, it is grouped rather than dropped.

Corrections are published on this page with a dated note; earlier editions remain accessible rather than being silently rewritten.

Questions about this report

So readers can see the questions were not written to produce a flattering answer, and so other centres can reuse the frame.

It is patient-journey data. Clinical outcomes are handled separately in the outcomes registry, which has its own protocol.

Yes, under CC BY 4.0. Comparable definitions across centres would make the whole sector easier to assess.

How to cite this report

StemCell Longevita (2026). International Regenerative Medicine Patient Trends: methodology and category frame for the 2027 edition. Istanbul.

Reuse is permitted under CC BY 4.0 with a link back to https://stemcelllongevita.com/reports/international-regenerative-medicine-patient-trends-2027. Corrections: contact the medical office.

Compiled by the StemCell Longevita medical office. Medically reviewed by Prof. Dr. Erdal Karaöz Team. Published . Method and definitions: editorial and evidence policy. This report is information about our own process and pricing, not medical advice and not a promise of clinical benefit.