Comparing offers
How to compare MSC sources: cord tissue, bone marrow and adipose
Wharton's jelly, bone marrow and fat all yield mesenchymal stromal cells, but they differ in donor age, yield, procedure burden and how they behave in culture.
- Medically reviewed by:
- Prof. Dr. Erdal Karaöz Team
- Last reviewed:
- Next review:
The short answer
The honest comparison is about trade-offs, not a winner. Autologous bone marrow and adipose avoid donor-matching questions but require a harvest procedure and decline in yield and proliferative capacity with donor age. Allogeneic Wharton's jelly MSCs come from a young, ethically donated tissue with high yield and no harvest procedure for you, but require donor screening, a licensed tissue establishment and, in most frameworks, a stricter regulatory pathway. Ask which source, why that source for your indication, and what the screening looks like.
How to weigh the sources
These steps work at any clinic, anywhere. Nothing here depends on choosing us.
- Ask which tissue the cells come from and whether the product is autologous (yours) or allogeneic (a donor's).
- If autologous, ask about the harvest: which procedure, what anaesthesia, what recovery, and what yield is expected at your age.
- If allogeneic, ask about donor consent, serological screening, and the tissue establishment licence behind the donation.
- Ask whether the cells are expanded in culture and for how many passages, since late-passage cells lose potency.
- Ask what culture supplements are used — human platelet lysate versus fetal bovine serum matters for both immunogenicity and for patients who object to animal products.
- Ask for the evidence specific to that source in your indication, not to MSCs in general.
What good looks like, and what should worry you
| What you are checking | An acceptable answer | A red flag |
|---|---|---|
| Source named | Specific tissue and autologous/allogeneic status | 'Stem cells' with no origin |
| Characterisation | ISCT marker panel confirms MSC identity | No marker data |
| Donor screening | Consent and serology described for allogeneic | Donor origin unexplained |
| Passage number | Stated, and low | Unknown passage history |
| Culture media | Supplement disclosed, xeno-free where claimed | 'Proprietary' with no detail |
| Indication fit | Source justified for your condition | Same product sold for everything |
How we grade claims like these: How we evaluate evidence · Editorial standards · Conflict-of-interest disclosure.
Documents to request in writing
Ask by email so the answer is documented. A clinic that cannot send these before payment is telling you something.
- The tissue source and autologous/allogeneic status in writing
- The ISCT marker panel for the batch
- Donor screening summary for allogeneic products
- Passage number and culture supplement used
Do not write it yourself: copy our ready-made email and WhatsApp request.
Frequently asked questions
Sources
- Dominici et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (ISCT position statement)
- Wharton's jelly versus bone marrow versus adipose mesenchymal stromal cells comparison proliferation — Head-to-head source comparisons.
- mesenchymal stromal cells donor age proliferative capacity senescence — Donor-age effects.
- EMA — Advanced therapy medicinal products: overview
Related verification guides
- Wharton's jelly MSCs explained
- How to compare cell doses
- Why Wharton's jelly MSCs are considered
- What the MSC evidence base shows
Use this on us too
Send these questions to us exactly as written. We answer them with documents, and if something does not apply to your case we say so.
